JRA Community

Permanent URI for this community

https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11990/10169
A collection of material's referenced in the Justice Research Academy's online course offerings.

Browse

Browsing JRA Community by Subject "Covariate balance"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment: Application to the efficacy of political advertisements
    (Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2018) Fong, Christian; Hazlett, Chad; Imai, Kosuke
    Propensity score matching and weighting are popular methods when estimating causal effects in observational studies. Beyond the assumption of unconfoundedness, however, these methods also require the model for the propensity score to be correctly specified. The recently proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology increases the robustness to model misspecification by directly optimizing sample covariate balance between the treatment and control groups. In this paper, we extend the CBPS to a continuous treatment. We propose the covariate balancing generalized propensity score (CBGPS) methodology, which minimizes the association between covariates and the treatment. We develop both parametric and nonparametric approaches and show their superior performance over the standard maximum likelihood estimation in a simulation study. The CBGPS methodology is applied to an observational study, whose goal is to estimate the causal effects of political advertisements on campaign contributions. We also provide open-source software that implements the proposed methods. [Author Abstract]
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The prognostic analogue of the propensity score
    (University of Michigan, 2007-03) Hansen, Ben B.
    The propensity score collapses the covariates of an observational study into a single measure summarizing their joint association with treatment conditions; prognostic scores summarize covariates’ association with potential responses. As with propensity scores, stratification on prognostic scores brings to uncontrolled studies a concrete and desirable form of balance, a balance that is more familiar as an objective of experimental control. Like propensity scores, prognostic scores can reduce the dimension of the covariate; yet causal inferences conditional on them are as valid as are inferences conditional only on the unreduced covariate. As a method of adjustment unto itself, prognostic scoring has limitations not shared with propensity scoring, but it holds promise as a complement to the propensity score, particularly in certain designs for which unassisted propensity adjustment is difficult or infeasible. [Author Abstract].